GlossaryCore Incrementality

Counterfactual

Also known as: Synthetic Control, Baseline Model

A counterfactual is a modeled alternate reality used to estimate causality. In marketing measurement, it represents what total revenue would have been if a specific channel’s spend were zero. SpendSignal estimates counterfactuals to compute incremental impact by taking the difference between observed reality and this hypothetical baseline.

The Short Version

The 'What-If' scenario. It tells you what sales you would have made if you did nothing.

Data Without Context

You know you spent $50K and made $200K. But you don't know how much of that $200K would have happened anyway.

Without a counterfactual baseline, you cannot measure true lift. You are flying blind, assuming every sale is a result of your ad.

How it works

1

Train a model on historical data (spend, revenue, seasonality)

2

Simulate a scenario where Channel X spend = 0

3

The gap between the simulation and actual revenue is the 'Incremental Lift'

Common Misconceptions

Using 'Pre-Post' analysis (Correlation is not causation)

Assuming counterfactual is a flat line (It must account for seasonality)

Confusing it with 'Control Groups' (Counterfactuals are synthetic controls)

In SpendSignal

SpendSignal builds a dynamic counterfactual for every channel every day. This allows us to report incrementality without needing you to run expensive holdout tests.

Frequently Asked Questions

QIs this a guess?

It's a statistical estimate based on historical patterns. It is far more accurate than assuming 100% or 0% incrementality.

QDo I need to stop spending to see this?

No. That's the beauty of synthetic counterfactuals. We model the zero-spend scenario mathematically so you don't have to experience the revenue loss of actually pausing ads.

Ask about ROAS, Attribution, or Budget...